UTG: Nope, still not a quality fund

Some may say CEF quality is in the eye of the beholder but they would be wrong.

A fund that underperforms a straight-up dumb passive ETF (XLU) over various time horizons despite being leveraged in an environment of strong stock returns is not a quality fund

A fund that destroys shareholder value by repeated dilutive rights offerings is not a quality fund

A fund that has less income than XLU, despite having the word “income” in its name is not a quality fund.

Reaves Utility Income Fund (UTG), please try harder.

Thanks for reading.

Check out the rest of our daily market commentary, as well as our Income Portfolios and interactive Investor Tools at Systematic Income.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.